Skip to content

Thermal and Infrared Cameras for Airside Autonomous Vehicles ​

The Missing Sensor: Night Operations, Personnel Safety, and Jet Blast Detection ​

Last updated: 2026-04-11

Related docs: Thermal IR Radiometry First Principles, Event and Thermal Camera Models, and Night Operations Thermal Fusion.


Table of Contents ​

  1. Why Thermal for Airside
  2. IR Wavelength Bands
  3. Detector Technologies
  4. Automotive-Grade Products
  5. Airside-Specific Applications
  6. Thermal + Visible Fusion
  7. Perception Models for Thermal
  8. Deployment on NVIDIA Orin
  9. Cost Analysis
  10. Recommended Configuration
  11. References

1. Why Thermal for Airside ​

1.1 The Night Operations Gap ​

Airport airside operations run 24/7. During night shifts, the critical perception challenges are:

ChallengeVisible CameraLiDAR4D RadarThermal Camera
Personnel at 50m (night)Fails (poor lighting)Detects (3D point)Detects (velocity)Excellent (body heat)
Personnel behind GSEFails (occlusion)PartialDetects (through gaps)Detects (heat signature through gaps)
Hi-vis vest effectivenessDay: good, Night: 84-88% AEB failureN/AN/AN/A — detects person, not vest
Jet engine running vs stoppedCannot distinguishCannot distinguishDetects blade rotationClear (exhaust plume visible)
Fuel spill on apronDifficult (transparent)Cannot detectCannot detectDetects (evaporative cooling)
De-icing fluid coverageCannot assessCannot assessCannot assessClear (thermal contrast)
Fire detectionVisible flame onlyCannot detectCannot detectDetects (early, even small)
Tire/brake heatCannot seeCannot seeCannot seeClear (overheating visible)

1.2 The Hi-Vis Paradox ​

From 70-operations-domains/airside/safety/ground-crew-pedestrian-safety.md:

Hi-vis clothing causes 84-88% failure rate in camera-based Automatic Emergency Braking at night due to retroreflective overexposure creating blooming artifacts.

Thermal cameras solve this completely. They detect the human body's thermal signature (~37°C) against the ambient background, regardless of clothing. Hi-vis vest is invisible to thermal — the person is always detectable.

1.3 Unique Airside Thermal Signatures ​

ObjectTypical TemperatureThermal ContrastDetection Ease
Running jet engine exhaust400-600°CExtremeTrivial
Jet exhaust plume (100m)50-150°C above ambientVery highEasy
Human body37°C (always)10-25°C above ambientVery easy
Recently-run APU80-150°CHighEasy
Hot brakes (after landing)150-300°CVery highEasy
Fuel spill (evaporative cooling)5-15°C below ambientMediumModerate
De-icing fluid on surface3-8°C below ambientLow-mediumModerate
Tire marks (friction heat)5-20°C above ambientLow-mediumModerate
Vehicle engine compartment80-110°CHighEasy
Heated building (winter)10-30°C above ambientMediumEasy
Metal GSE in sunUp to 70°C above ambientHighEasy (can cause false positives)

2. IR Wavelength Bands ​

2.1 Spectrum Overview ​

Visible  |  NIR   |  SWIR   |  MWIR   |  LWIR   |  VLWIR
0.4-0.7  | 0.7-1  | 1-2.5   | 3-5     | 8-14    | >14 μm
         |        |         |         |         |
 Cameras | Night  | See     | Cooled  | Uncooled|
         | vision | through | InSb    | Micro-  |
         | (Si)   | fog     | FPA     | bolom.  |
         |        | (InGaAs)|         | (VOx)   |

2.2 Band Comparison for Airside ​

BandWavelengthDetectorCoolingCostBest For (Airside)
NIR0.7-1.0 μmSilicon CCD/CMOSNone$100-500Cheap night vision with active IR illumination
SWIR1.0-2.5 μmInGaAsNone/TEC$5-20KSeeing through fog, smoke, de-icing mist
MWIR3-5 μmInSb, MCT, T2SLCryo (-200°C)$20-100KHighest sensitivity, gas detection, long range
LWIR8-14 μmVOx microbolometerNone (uncooled)$500-5KBest overall for AV: personnel, engines, low cost

Recommended for airside AV: LWIR (8-14 μm)

  • Uncooled = no cryocooler = lower cost, smaller, more reliable
  • Peak thermal emission from room-temperature objects (Wien's law: 37°C body peaks at ~9.3 μm)
  • Through atmosphere window (minimal absorption)
  • Automotive-grade products available from multiple vendors

2.3 Atmospheric Windows ​

IR radiation must pass through atmosphere to reach camera.
Two main transmission windows:

Window 1: 3-5 μm (MWIR)
  - Good transmission
  - Hot objects (engines, exhaust) emit strongly here
  - BUT: requires cryogenic cooling

Window 2: 8-14 μm (LWIR)
  - Excellent transmission
  - Room-temperature objects emit strongly here
  - Uncooled detectors available
  - BEST for personnel detection

Between windows (5-8 μm): strong atmospheric absorption (water vapor)
  → Useless for outdoor imaging

3. Detector Technologies ​

3.1 Microbolometer (LWIR) ​

The dominant technology for automotive/AV thermal cameras:

Operating principle:
  IR photons → absorbed by thin film (VOx or a-Si)
  → temperature rise → resistance change → voltage change
  → no cooling needed (operates at room temperature)

Key specs (state-of-art 2025):
  Pixel pitch: 12 μm (high-end), 17 μm (standard), 25 μm (legacy)
  Resolution: 640×480 (VGA), 1024×768 (XGA), 1280×1024 (SXGA)
  NETD: 30-50 mK (can detect 0.03°C differences)
  Frame rate: 30-60 Hz (some up to 120 Hz for fast objects)
  Response time: 8-12 ms
  
Manufacturers (detector):
  - ULIS / Lynred (France) — market leader, VOx, 12μm pixel
  - DRS / Leonardo DRS (US) — military + automotive
  - BAE Systems (UK) — VOx
  - Raytron (China) — fast-growing, competitive pricing

3.2 Cooled InSb/MCT (MWIR) ​

For maximum performance (military, high-end surveillance):

Operating principle:
  IR photons → directly excite electrons in semiconductor
  → photocurrent proportional to IR intensity
  → requires cryogenic cooling to ~77K (-196°C)

Key specs:
  Pixel pitch: 10-30 μm
  Resolution: up to 2048×2048
  NETD: 10-20 mK (2-5x better than microbolometer)
  Frame rate: up to 1000 Hz
  
Cost: $20K-100K per camera (cooler dominates cost)
Size/weight: 2-5x larger than uncooled
MTBF: 5,000-10,000 hours (cooler limited)

NOT recommended for airside AV due to cost and reliability.
Exception: airport-wide surveillance from tower (shared infrastructure cost).

4. Automotive-Grade Products ​

4.1 FLIR / Teledyne FLIR ​

Teledyne FLIR is the dominant thermal camera brand, with dedicated automotive products:

ProductTypeResolutionPixel PitchNETDInterfacePrice (Est.)
Boson 640Core module640×51212 μm<40 mKCMOS parallel, USB$3-6K
Boson 320Core module320×25612 μm<50 mKCMOS parallel, USB$1.5-3K
Lepton 3.5Micro module160×12012 μm<50 mKSPI, I2C$200-400
ADK (Auto Dev Kit)Full camera640×51212 μm<40 mKGigE, CAN$5-10K
PathFindIR IIIAutomotive320×24025 μm<60 mKNTSC analog$3-5K

Boson 640 is the recommended core for airside AV:

  • Automotive-grade (-40°C to +80°C operating)
  • 12 μm pixel pitch (state of the art for uncooled)
  • 640×512 resolution — sufficient for pedestrian detection at 100m+
  • Multiple lens options (4.9mm to 50mm focal length)
  • Radiometric output (actual temperature values, not just relative)
  • ITAR-controlled (US export restrictions may apply)

4.2 Seek Thermal ​

ProductResolutionInterfacePriceNotes
Seek Starter Kit206×156USB-C$150-250Dev evaluation only
Seek Mosaic Core320×240MIPI CSI-2$500-1KEmbeddable, automotive-intent
Seek Mosaic Pro640×480MIPI CSI-2, GigE$2-4KAV-grade, wide dynamic range

Seek Mosaic Pro is a strong alternative to FLIR Boson:

  • Non-ITAR (no US export restrictions)
  • MIPI CSI-2 interface (direct to Orin)
  • Automotive-grade temperature range
  • Competitive pricing

4.3 InfiRay (China) ​

ProductResolutionNETDInterfacePriceNotes
AT61640×512<30 mKGigE$2-4KBest NETD in class
AT31384×288<35 mKGigE, USB3$1.5-3KMid-range
Micro III256×192<40 mKUSB-C, MIPI$300-600Compact module

InfiRay AT61 offers the best noise performance (<30 mK NETD) at competitive pricing. Subject to CFIUS/entity list considerations for US/EU military-adjacent applications.

4.4 Lynred (France, European Alternative) ​

Lynred (formerly Sofradir + ULIS) manufactures the detectors used by many thermal camera brands:

ProductResolutionPitchTechnologyNotes
PICO1024 Gen21024×76812 μma-SiHighest resolution uncooled
PICO640 Gen2640×48012 μma-SiStandard automotive
Micro80 Gen280×8012 μma-SiUltra-compact for array configs

Lynred detectors are used in cameras from Teledyne FLIR (Boson family), Opgal, Guide Sensmart, and others. For a European supply chain, Lynred + European integrator avoids ITAR/Chinese supply chain concerns.


5. Airside-Specific Applications ​

5.1 Personnel Detection at Night ​

The primary safety use case. 27,000 ramp accidents per year, many at night.

Thermal personnel detection at night:

Human body: ~33-35°C skin, ~37°C core
Ambient (night): -10°C to 25°C (seasonal)
ΔT: 8-47°C → ALWAYS detectable in LWIR

Detection range (640×512, 19mm lens):
  - Person detection: >200m
  - Person recognition: >100m
  - Identification: >50m

Detection range (640×512, 6.3mm lens, wide angle):
  - Person detection: >80m
  - Person recognition: >40m

Comparison with visible camera at night:
  Visible + apron lighting: detect person at ~20-30m (unreliable)
  Thermal LWIR: detect person at ~80-200m (highly reliable)
  Improvement: 3-8x detection range at night

5.2 Jet Blast Zone Detection ​

Jet engine exhaust temperature profile:

Engine type    | Exhaust temp (nozzle) | At 50m behind  | At 100m behind
─────────────  | ───────────────────── | ────────────── | ───────────────
Turbofan (CFM56)| 600°C               | ~80°C          | ~40°C
Turbofan (LEAP) | 550°C               | ~70°C          | ~35°C
APU             | 300-400°C           | ~40°C          | ~25°C
Turboprop       | 500°C               | ~60°C          | ~30°C

LWIR thermal camera can:
  1. Detect engine exhaust plume shape and extent
  2. Determine if engines are running or shutdown
  3. Estimate blast danger zone in real-time
  4. Detect unexpected engine start during pushback
  
This is IMPOSSIBLE with any other sensor:
  - Visible camera: cannot see hot air (transparent)
  - LiDAR: cannot detect gas (no solid particles)
  - Radar: partially detects turbulence, unreliable
  - Thermal: CLEARLY sees entire exhaust plume

5.3 De-Icing Fluid Monitoring ​

De-icing fluid (Type I/IV glycol):
  - Applied at 60-80°C
  - Cools to ambient over 5-30 minutes
  - Thermal camera shows:
    - Coverage completeness (is entire wing surface treated?)
    - Holdover time estimation (how fast is it cooling?)
    - Re-freeze detection (sudden temperature drop)
    
Application for autonomous de-icing GSE:
  - Thermal-guided spray pattern optimization
  - Automated coverage verification
  - Holdover time monitoring → signal departure readiness

5.4 FOD Detection ​

Foreign Object Debris detection via thermal contrast:

Day: FOD on concrete apron has different thermal mass
  - Metal FOD heats faster than concrete in sun
  - Rubber FOD absorbs more IR
  - Detection: moderate (depends on ΔT)

Night: FOD retains different heat than concrete
  - Metal cools faster → colder than concrete
  - Rubber retains heat → warmer than concrete
  - Detection: moderate-good

Best approach: thermal + visible fusion
  - Visible: detects color/shape contrast
  - Thermal: detects temperature contrast
  - Fusion: catches what either alone misses

5.5 Fire and Fuel Spill Detection ​

Fire detection:
  - Thermal camera detects flame at 600-1500°C
  - Also detects pre-fire conditions (overheating components)
  - Sub-second detection (vs minutes for smoke detectors)
  - Range: 100m+ for small fire

Fuel spill:
  - Jet fuel (Jet A-1) evaporates at ~40°C
  - Evaporative cooling creates thermal signature
  - Spill appears as cool region on warm concrete
  - Detection possible even for thin films
  
Combined with 4D radar:
  - Radar detects liquid surface reflectivity change
  - Thermal confirms evaporative cooling signature
  - Dual confirmation reduces false positives

6. Thermal + Visible Fusion ​

6.1 Fusion Approaches ​

Approach 1: Pixel-level fusion (early fusion)
  Thermal image + Visible image → Aligned → Combined multi-channel image
  → Single detection model on fused input
  
  Pros: Maximum information available to model
  Cons: Requires precise alignment (registration), different resolutions

Approach 2: Feature-level fusion (intermediate fusion)
  Thermal → Backbone → Features ──┐
                                   ├── Fusion module → Detection head
  Visible → Backbone → Features ──┘
  
  Pros: Handles misalignment better, can use different backbones
  Cons: More complex architecture

Approach 3: Decision-level fusion (late fusion)
  Thermal → Full detector → Detections ──┐
                                          ├── NMS/merge → Final detections
  Visible → Full detector → Detections ──┘
  
  Pros: Simplest, independent failure modes
  Cons: Cannot recover what either detector alone missed

6.2 Registration / Alignment ​

Thermal and visible cameras have different optics, resolution, and field of view. Alignment options:

MethodAccuracyEffortNotes
Stereo calibrationSub-pixelOne-time setupUse checkerboard heated with IR lamp
Deep homography~2 pixelLearnedNeural network predicts alignment
Feature matchingVariableAutomaticFails when thermal/visible features differ greatly
Co-located sensorPerfect (shared optics)NoneExpensive dual-sensor cameras available

Recommended for airside: Stereo calibration (one-time) + deep homography refinement (handles small shifts from vibration/thermal expansion).

6.3 Key Datasets for Thermal Perception ​

DatasetYearModalitiesAnnotationsSizeFocus
KAIST2015Visible + LWIRPedestrian bbox95K pairsPedestrian detection, day/night
LLVIP2021Visible + LWIRPedestrian bbox16.8K pairsLow-light visible + infrared
FLIR ADAS v22022Visible + LWIR4 classes bbox26.4K thermalAutomotive (vehicles, people, bikes, dogs)
M3FD2022Visible + LWIR6 classes bbox4.2K pairsMulti-modal fusion, fog/night
DroneVehicle2022Visible + LWIROriented bbox56.9K pairsAerial vehicle detection
InfiRay MOOD2023Visible + LWIR6 classes bbox1.5K pairsAutomotive, Chinese driving

No airside thermal dataset exists. This is another gap and opportunity.

6.4 Night Performance Comparison ​

From KAIST and LLVIP benchmarks:

MethodDay (Visible)Night (Visible)Night (Thermal)Night (Fusion)
YOLOv5 (pedestrian)91.2%62.8%84.3%89.7%
Faster R-CNN89.1%58.4%81.2%87.3%
Thermal-only YOLO——85.1%—
Halfway Fusion———91.4%

Key insight: Thermal alone at night (84-85%) nearly matches visible during day (89-91%). Thermal+visible fusion at night (89-91%) achieves near-daytime performance.


7. Perception Models for Thermal ​

7.1 Pre-trained Models Available ​

ModelFrameworkThermal DatasetPerformanceLicense
YOLOv8 (fine-tuned on FLIR)UltralyticsFLIR ADAS v2~80% mAP pedestrianAGPL/Enterprise
YOLOX-ThermalYOLOXKAIST~76% mAP pedestrianApache 2.0
Thermal-DETRDETR variantLLVIP~82% mAP pedestrianResearch
ThermalDetCustomMulti-dataset~85% mAP pedestrianResearch

7.2 Domain Adaptation for Airside ​

Road thermal datasets (KAIST, FLIR ADAS) have different characteristics from airside:

AspectRoad ThermalAirside Thermal
PedestriansCasual clothing, varied posesHi-vis + PPE, airport-specific gear
VehiclesCars, trucks, busesGSE (tractors, belt loaders, fuel trucks)
BackgroundAsphalt, buildings, treesConcrete, aircraft, jet bridges
TemperatureWide ambient rangeSimilar, plus jet exhaust heat
Viewing angleDash-mounted (1.2-1.5m)Various (1-3m on GSE)

Transfer learning strategy:

  1. Start with YOLO/DETR pre-trained on COCO (visible)
  2. Fine-tune on FLIR ADAS thermal dataset (general thermal)
  3. Fine-tune on small airside thermal dataset (100-500 annotated frames)
  4. Expected: >80% mAP for personnel detection with just 200 airside frames

7.3 Thermal Object Detection on Orin ​

Pipeline: Thermal camera → GStreamer → TensorRT inference → ROS topic

GStreamer pipeline for thermal camera:
  gst-launch-1.0 \
    v4l2src device=/dev/video_thermal ! \
    video/x-raw,format=GRAY16_LE,width=640,height=512,framerate=30/1 ! \
    videoconvert ! \
    appsink name=thermal_sink

TensorRT model:
  Input: 640×512 single-channel (16-bit thermal)
  Model: YOLOv8s fine-tuned for thermal
  Output: bounding boxes + class labels
  
  Latency on Orin (FP16): ~8-12ms per frame
  Memory: ~500 MB
  Power: ~5W

ROS integration:
  /thermal_raw (sensor_msgs/Image, encoding=mono16)
  /thermal_detections (vision_msgs/Detection2DArray)
  /thermal_overlay (sensor_msgs/Image — visualization with boxes)

8. Deployment on NVIDIA Orin ​

8.1 Camera Interface Options ​

InterfaceBandwidthLatencyOrin SupportRecommended For
MIPI CSI-2Up to 2.5 Gbps/lane<1msNative (16 CSI-2 ports)Direct connection, lowest latency
GigE Vision1 Gbps1-5msVia NIC (PCIe)Standard industrial, longer cable
USB35 Gbps1-3msNative USB3.2Development, less reliable for production
Analog (NTSC)N/A~33msVia capture cardLegacy cameras only

Recommended: MIPI CSI-2 for Orin integration (direct, lowest latency, no additional hardware). Boson 640 and Seek Mosaic both support MIPI CSI-2.

8.2 Thermal Camera Integration Diagram ​

Orin AGX Developer Kit
  ├── CSI Port 0-3: Visible cameras (4× surround)
  ├── CSI Port 4-5: Thermal cameras (2× front + rear)
  │     ├── FLIR Boson 640 (front, 50mm lens) — long range
  │     └── Seek Mosaic Pro (rear, wide angle) — close range
  ├── Ethernet: LiDAR data (4-8× RoboSense)
  ├── CAN: Vehicle bus
  └── USB: IMU, GPS

Processing pipeline:
  CSI thermal → ISP bypass (raw 14-bit) → NvBufSurface 
  → TensorRT inference (YOLO thermal, 8ms) → ROS topic
  
  Total thermal pipeline latency: <15ms
  Additional GPU load: ~3-5W, ~500 MB

8.3 Multi-Spectral BEV Fusion ​

For full-stack integration, thermal can be fused into the BEV perception pipeline:

Visible cameras (6-8) → Image backbone → BEV features
Thermal cameras (2-4) → Thermal backbone → BEV features (separate)
LiDAR (4-8) → PointPillars → BEV features

All BEV features → Multi-modal BEV fusion (BEVFusion-style)
                → Unified 3D perception

Thermal channels: Add thermal BEV as additional modality
  - Same LSS (Lift-Splat-Shoot) projection as visible cameras
  - But thermal provides complementary information:
    - People detected even when visible fails (night, hi-vis blooming)
    - Engine status visible (running/stopped)
    - Hot exhaust zones mapped

9. Cost Analysis ​

9.1 Per-Vehicle Cost ​

ComponentQuantityUnit CostTotalNotes
FLIR Boson 640 (core)2$4-6K$8-12KFront + rear
Lens (19mm, f/1.0)2$500-1K$1-2KMatched to Boson
Housing (IP67, automotive)2$500-1K$1-2KWeatherproof enclosure
MIPI CSI-2 adapter board2$200-400$400-800Interface to Orin
Calibration + integration1$2-5K$2-5KEngineering time
Total per vehicle$12.4-21.8K

Alternative (budget):

ComponentQuantityUnit CostTotal
Seek Mosaic Pro (core)2$2-4K$4-8K
Lens + housing2$1-1.5K$2-3K
Integration1$2-3K$2-3K
Total per vehicle$8-14K

9.2 Infrastructure Thermal Cameras ​

For fixed infrastructure (stand monitoring, taxiway surveillance):

Use CaseCameraQuantity/AirportCost EachTotal
Stand personnel monitoringFLIR A700 (fixed)20-40 (1 per stand)$5-8K$100-320K
Taxiway intersectionPTZ thermal5-10$8-15K$40-150K
Wide-area surveillancePan-tilt thermal2-4 (on towers)$15-30K$30-120K
Total infrastructure$170-590K

9.3 ROI for Night Safety ​

MetricWithout ThermalWith Thermal
Night pedestrian detection range20-30m (visible)80-200m (thermal)
Night detection reliability60-70%95%+
Ramp incident reductionBaselineEst. 30-50% fewer incidents
Annual ramp incident cost (per airport)$2-10M$1-5M
Annual savings$1-5M
Payback period (per vehicle)<1 year

10.1 Vehicle-Mounted Thermal (2 cameras per GSE) ​

Position 1: Front-facing, long range
  Camera: FLIR Boson 640 + 19mm f/1.0 lens
  FoV: 32° × 26°
  Range: 200m+ person detection
  Purpose: Forward path safety, approaching aircraft, jet blast

Position 2: Rear/side, wide angle  
  Camera: FLIR Boson 640 + 6.3mm f/1.0 lens
  FoV: 95° × 75°
  Range: 50m+ person detection
  Purpose: Close-range personnel, reversing safety, side clearance

Optional Position 3-4: Additional side-facing for 360° coverage
  Camera: Seek Mosaic Pro (lower cost)
  Purpose: Complete surround thermal coverage

10.2 Integration Priority ​

PriorityIntegration StepEffortBenefit
1Mount 2× thermal on one test vehicle2-4 weeksNight personnel detection proof-of-concept
2Train YOLO on FLIR ADAS + small airside set1-2 weeksThermal person/vehicle detector
3Late fusion with existing LiDAR pipeline2-4 weeksCombined day/night detection
4BEV fusion (thermal + LiDAR + visible)2-3 monthsFull multi-spectral perception
5Jet blast zone estimation from thermal1-2 monthsUnique safety feature

10.3 Sensor Suite Update ​

Adding thermal to the recommended airside sensor suite (from 90-synthesis/master/master-synthesis.md):

SensorQtyPurposeAirside Rationale
Cameras (surround)6-8Primary perceptionRich semantic info
Thermal LWIR2-4Night safety, jet blastPersonnel at night, engine status
LiDAR (128-ch)13D geometryLarge objects, localization
4D Radar2-4Velocity, all-weatherRain, de-icing, fog
RTK-GNSS1Localizationcm-level in open areas
ADS-B receiver1Aircraft awarenessReal-time aircraft positions
IMU1Dead reckoningBridge GPS gaps

11. References ​

Products ​

  • FLIR Boson: https://www.flir.com/products/boson/
  • FLIR ADK: https://www.flir.com/products/adk/
  • Seek Thermal Mosaic: https://www.thermal.com/mosaic-core.html
  • InfiRay AT Series: https://www.infiray.com/thermal-modules.html
  • Lynred PICO series: https://www.lynred.com/products

Datasets ​

  • KAIST Multispectral Pedestrian: https://soonminhwang.github.io/rgbt-ped-detection/
  • LLVIP: https://bupt-ai-cz.github.io/LLVIP/
  • FLIR ADAS v2: https://www.flir.com/oem/adas/adas-dataset-agree/
  • M3FD: Multi-modal Fusion Dataset for autonomous driving

Papers ​

  • Hwang et al., "Multispectral Pedestrian Detection: Benchmark Dataset and Baseline," CVPR 2015
  • Jia et al., "LLVIP: A Visible-Infrared Paired Dataset for Low-Light Vision," ICCV 2021
  • Zhang et al., "Multispectral Fusion for Object Detection with Cyclic Fuse-and-Refine Blocks," ICIP 2020
  • Cao et al., "Attention-Guided Multi-modal and Multi-scale Fusion for Multispectral Pedestrian Detection," IEEE TITS 2023
TopicDocument
4D radar (all-weather primary)20-av-platform/sensors/4d-radar.md
Ground crew safety (hi-vis paradox)70-operations-domains/airside/safety/ground-crew-pedestrian-safety.md
Adverse conditions (de-icing, fog)60-safety-validation/verification-validation/robustness/airside-adverse-conditions.md
FOD and jet blast70-operations-domains/airside/operations/fod-and-jetblast.md
Production perception systems30-autonomy-stack/perception/overview/production-perception-systems.md
Sensor fusion architectures30-autonomy-stack/perception/overview/sensor-fusion-architectures.md
NVIDIA Orin technical20-av-platform/compute/nvidia-orin-technical.md
Infrastructure cooperative perception30-autonomy-stack/perception/overview/infrastructure-cooperative-perception.md

Public research notes collected from public sources.